NOT KNOWN DETAILS ABOUT H335 POWDER LOAD DATA

Not known Details About h335 powder load data

Not known Details About h335 powder load data

Blog Article

I do evaluate Every single empty trimmed situation with calipers and make sure They can be inside of a certain variety that's shown within the Hodgdon book in addition to making sure the OAL length is throughout the released data also.

I looked at Hogdon's relative burn off rate chart & H335 appears to generally be quite a bit a lot quicker than CFE. Varget and BL-C2 appear to be much like CFE with regard to melt away level.

You should not rule out H335 for the massive Bores both. Check Hornady and Barnes for your .458 Get Mag and .45-70 While using the heavies. I have identified almost nothing far better in those two. And i am not by itself in that discovery -- any time you will need extra space for powder.

Posted: 5/3/2016 7:forty seven:48 AM EDT [#nine] I have been seeking CFE223 with some fifty five grain bullets.  However dealing with it.  I can express that It appears to "feed" pretty well.  I've been working with my Hornady Digital powder measure/scale whilst Performing up my loads.  The CFE223 feeds so quickly the powder evaluate are not able to accurately meter it (the Digital just one).  It provides me frequent over alarms.  Even using the manner button to slow down the metering a lot more than placing it in "sluggish" would not operate.  I've not attempted it in the regular powder measure nonetheless but expect It could be pretty reliable. I did, kind of Blessed definitely, run across an exceedingly exact BLC2 load a couple array visits back.

I did make up a dozen or so dummy cartridges to examine performing in equally a AR along with a Mini-14, so I cycled them in the Howa and so they loaded no dilemma, I didn't will need any pressure for them to chamber.

I haven't gotten to load enhancement nevertheless as my capturing went way down previous year having a new son and go from AZ to MT.

Starting up Loads should originate from revealed reloading data, not from Web. Not attempting to choose on you, you’ll end up getting much more correct ammo if you work them up and check them your self within your rifle.  This includes pinpointing the very best powder using your chosen bullet inside your rifle.

Because of the similarities between the .308 along with the 7.62x51mm cartridges, There have been some confusion concerning primer option. For instance, the 7.62x51 is loaded with a big rifle magnum primer, including the CCI No. 34. Some of the reasoning for applying this comparatively scorching primer features click here reliable ignition with spherical powders under all temperature extremes.

This isn’t unusual as I’ve noticed the disparity in load recommendations in the course of my 40 years of reloading. Nonetheless it doesn’t hurt to question.

2) For the reason that TSX Bullets are all-copper, they may have different tension qualities in comparison to traditional jacketed bullets. Within our lab, We now have experienced best pressures and precision when TSX Bullets are seated .

Bottom line is always that for plinking ammo, I wouldn't switch Except if you need to get a couple extra FPS for the same demand fat or save powder for the same velocity (won't help save much)

The group on the proper would be the balistic suggestions, I belive This really is 30 pictures but dont estimate me, this was past winter. 100yds also.

I might love to consider other powders. Regrettably, I've by no means seen a can of CFE223 and it looks like it'll be a long time prior to I will. The good thing is, I continue to have the greatest Component of 8lbs. of H335 remaining. At 25gr for each load, It will continue to take a yr or two to implement up.

My Preferred correct load for 223 is H322 with 55gr V-max Or BIB bullets if I am truly attempting to shoot. I love the way CFE223 meters and shoots extremely nicely but H322 is a lot more correct for me.

Report this page